The Relationship Between Obesity and Amputation-free Survival in Patients Undergoing Lower-limb Revascularisation for Chronic Limb-threatening Ischaemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The obesity paradox is a well-documented phenomenon in cardiovascular disease, however it remains poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the relationship between body mass (as measured by body mass index [BMI]) and 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS) for patients undergoing lower limb revascularisation for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all consecutive patients undergoing lower limb revascularisation for CLTI at the Leicester Vascular Institute between February 2018-19. Baseline demographics and outcomes were collected using electronic records. BMI was stratified using the World Health Organization criteria. One-year AFS (composite of major amputation/death) was the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and adjusted Cox's proportional hazard models were used to compare groups to patients of normal mass. RESULTS: One-hundred and ninety patients were included. Overall, no difference was identified in 1-year AFS across all groups (pooled P = 0.335). Compared to patients with normal BMI (n = 66), obese patients (n = 43) had a significantly lower adjusted combined risk of amputation/death (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.92, P = 0.032), however no significant differences were observed for overweight (aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.47-1.70, P = 0.741), morbidly obese (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.41-3.20, P = 0.797) and underweight individuals (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 0.56-6.20, P = 0.314). CONCLUSIONS: In the context of CLTI, obesity is potentially associated with favourable amputation-free survival at 1 year, compared to normal body mass. The results of this study support the notion of an obesity paradox existing within CLTI and question whether current guidance on weight management requires a more patient-specific approach.

Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease With the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) Technique: Results of a UK Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: This UK multicenter study aims to report early- and medium-term results following covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) or intermittent claudication (IC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective case analysis was performed of patients who underwent CERAB between November 1, 2012 and March 31, 2020 in 6 centers across the United Kingdom. Anatomical data, including degree of plaque calcification, were assessed using preoperative imaging. Outcome measures included mortality, perioperative complications, target lesion reintervention (TLR), and major limb amputation. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patencies were calculated at set intervals. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients underwent CERAB over the study period for the following reasons [48% presenting with CLTI (Rutherford 4-6) and 52% with IC (Rutherford 1-3)]; 82% presented had Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D AIOD disease. Median age was 65 years (range 42-90 years); 76% of the cohort were male. Severely calcified aortic and iliac lesions were noted in 90% and 80% of patients, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 18 months (range 1-91 months), 2 (1.7%) patients were lost to follow up. In total 5, (4.3%) patients died and 2 (1.7%) had a major amputation. Endovascular TLR was required in 14 (12.1%) patients at last follow up. Surgical TLR was performed in 4 (3.4%) patients at last follow-up. Seven (6%) patients developed an aortic/iliac stent occlusion at last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) freedom from TLR at 1 year was 94% and KM 1-year primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency were 88%, 94%, and 98% respectively. Subanalysis found the following features were associated with need for TLR; TASC D disease (OR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.71), severe aortic calcification (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.20), and presence of tissue loss at baseline (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.63). CONCLUSION: Perioperative (<30 days) and medium-term morbidity, mortality, and patency rates in this pragmatic cohort of patients with severe AIOD lesions show that CERAB is a valid revascularization option. A direct comparison with surgical treatments for AIOD in a randomized controlled trial is justified.

Medical Education in a Post COVID-19 era - remote teaching methods for cardiovascular knowledge and skills.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction As traditional clinical teaching faces major obstacles during the COVID-19 pandemic, medical educators look toward remote teaching methods to provide solutions to allow continuation of teaching. Remote methods, teaching delivered other than face-to-face, align with the transformation seen within pedagogy over the last 20 years. Aim The aim of this scoping review was to i) identify existing teaching methods available to remotely teach cardiovascular knowledge or skills and ii) identify if they have been evaluated. Methods A scoping review of the literature was undertaken to synthesise available evidence and examine remote teaching methods for application to undergraduate medical education. Results Forty-two articles were identified which presented remote teaching methods using either teaching based online, computer-programs, digital resources, mobile-phone technology, podcasts, serious gaming, social media or resources to aid self-directed learning. Although results were heterogenous, they gave an indication of the method's usefulness. However, evaluations were not consistent and if they were, would have strengthened the value of the findings. Conclusion Various remote teaching methods are available to replace face-to-face cardiovascular teaching where this is not possible. Evidence for effectiveness and engagement of individual platforms are variable. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, medical educators should prioritise ongoing evaluation of remote teaching methods and share best practice.